Liberal Forum

A) I have answered the question. B) I'm weary of trying to figure out what, if any, question you will answer  ...

Youvare absurd. You obviously have strong opinions about some vague position. When I ask you to define it you cannot. Why even speak to you?...

But that was before military theory decided rate of fire is tactically superior to the power of the round. You think they did so on the basis of the advice of a Magic 8 ball? Because of its enormous crossover potential? But you would probably consider the m1 garand to be a friendly gun. It has wood...

But you clearly are low info. Because you cannot give a single educated answer about why you would want to ban the ar15. I have...and I'm sick of having to repeat myself to **** morons.. are you a **** moron? Where do you draw the line and what sort of people should have what restrictions? Why? Do...

https://twitter.com/Fahrenthold/status/ ... 64384?s=19 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... gDyPSuW5zw...

https://twitter.com/davidmackau/status/ ... 32064?s=19 Buh bye!  ...

Like let's say I went nuts and wanted the sit in a clock tower and snipe random people. I would totally choose a 30- 06 over an ar15. Even if people try to hide behind cars for shelter it can shoot through the **** car and kill them. But this is a hunting round. It was used in the military...yes.....

But you clearly are low info. Because you cannot give a single educated answer about why you would want to ban the ar15. Where do you draw the line and what sort of people should have what restrictions? Why? You don't know because you do not even seem to know the specifics of the ar15. Like fyi...

...

I grew weary of repeating myself...and if you're obliged to reinvent language to try to contest the unambiguous language of citations, how does that make ME loinfo?  ...