Liberal Forum

Now, whether one agrees or not with this position, one cannot mistake it for anything except a clear and concise position statement. I would like to see more of this from you, young man - from ALL of you young men....

If instead your retarded platoon was armed with ar15s I could at least kill 3 of you. With just a 30- 06 hunting rifle. No problem....

Now say you were part ofan entire platoon who were armed with m16s. (Not an ar15). Then i could certainly kill one of you with a 30- 06. But the rest of you could lay suppressing fire and force me to take cover. You would probably ultimately win the confrontation. But I could kill one of you......

That's ****. I would never give an ar15 to military personell. It is not used by anyone in any military. You are just wrong....

Like..you take an ar15...give me a 30- 06 hunting rifle with a Shepard scope. I will kill you about 200 yards before you would even see me....

What is the **** mystery.. It is a tool designed for a specific military application - one you have already described...it has no legitimate civilian use.. Because we accept the principle that not all weapons are appropriate for civilian enjoyment, we should have no reason to ignore it here. Is t...

...

I could easily prove to you that the 30- 06 is superior to the .223. I mean...we could duel over that lol. (Its stupid but yeah I would win) Do you even have a coherent position here?...

I don't care. No.  ...

I did not see you answer any question bro. Let me ask you this...are you in favor of banning 30- 06 hunting rifles?...