User avatar
Huey
16 Oct 2020 04:56 pm
Huey
User avatar
Just once.  Let me when you do. anyway, this is the equivalent of taking a Ferrari, removing the engine and drivetrain, and replacing it those with the engine and drive train of a **** stained VW GTI.  You no longer have a high performance sports car.    ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
16 Oct 2020 04:46 pm
Huey
User avatar
You haven't. You lost.   But by all means continue.  Bring citations.  None or your citations say modified Avg Guy.  Dude, it is not a weakness to admit you dont know everything about everything.  And firearms related issue is not in your wheel house.   You don't like the weapon because of appeara...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
FOS
16 Oct 2020 04:37 pm
FOS
User avatar
Well civilians can't buy either an m16 or an mp5 without a special licence...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
16 Oct 2020 04:26 pm
Blackvegetable
User avatar
For once, you've offered something something inadvertently useful... You are absolutely correct about its functionality....thereby demonstrating the complete absence of justification for civilian use... In fact, you might even prefer to kill a bunch of people with a Ruger Mini 14....  ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
FOS
16 Oct 2020 04:22 pm
FOS
User avatar
The funny part about all this is that a 'Weapon designed for military use' is not mevessarily a good choice for terrorism or crime. A gun used in the military is assuming about 200 yards of distance...enemy also having guns...and body armor...and hopes to injure more than it kills because injury con...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
16 Oct 2020 04:20 pm
Blackvegetable
User avatar
modifications to components... which make the DESIGN compatible with the law.. Why didn’t the military use it for the battlefield.  Keep running from that lil ******. how many **** times must I answer that question?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
16 Oct 2020 04:15 pm
Huey
User avatar
redesigned bolt carrier. Redesigned lower. Redesigned hammer. Redesigned disconnected. Redesigned Selectir.   all of that is what makes a rifle battle ready or for civilian use. it is Not and never has been a weapon for the batt field. Why didn’t the military use it for the battlefield.  Keep...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
16 Oct 2020 04:11 pm
Blackvegetable
User avatar
Yes...they are modifications, Verbal...you're being decimated....again. So we are back to your hatred of those who are attracted to that semi auto sports rifle designed for and built for civilian use No....the attraction is the purpose for which it was designed...the modification is like the condom....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
16 Oct 2020 04:08 pm
Huey
User avatar
Those aren’t modifications.  But call it whatever your mind of average intelligent wants. Once you redesigned those parts you and assembled them in a new lower receiver you have a weapon designed for civilian use.  That weapon is not capable of automatic fire.  It was never marketed for battle fiel...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
16 Oct 2020 04:03 pm
Blackvegetable
User avatar
you just listed a bunch of MODIFICATIONS....... Verbal, You suck at English........
— LiberalForum Archive