Liberal Forum

Conservative math...

Still waiting for you to explain why my numbers (from your link the OP), supported by YOUR graph is wrong, and why YOUR numbers contradict YOUR graph....

I never, EVER "attributed" the 1981 economic conditions or recession to Reagan. And as usual, you didn't quote my actual words. Lying freaking troll....

Hogwash, but even accepting your idiocy, Carter inherited an economy that was moderately healthy, as I claimed and you stupidly denied. That's funny. A flat year is a "powerful downward spiral?" It was followed by a 2.6% growth year: a year that CARTER - not REAGAN - made the budget. Rhetoric a...

Son, I play the game as well or better than you. snicker...

You JUST GOT THROUGH attributing 1981 to Reagan. IN YOUR LAST POST. You truly are a hypocrite, son....

Not much on math, are ya? That kind of growth is pretty easy to achieve after two down years. You would have to add the negatives and divide by three to get an honest picture of what Carter inherited. [/quote] That's funny. A flat year is a "powerful downward spiral?" It was followed by a 2.6% g...

Don't be freaking stupid. A president doesn't "own" an economy just because he took office. Did Dubya "own" the 2001 recession that began in March? Did Clinton "own" the strongly recovering economy as he took office? Is there any issue you won't utterly bungle?...

The chart was proof of YOUR claim, not mine. The problem for you is that YOUR chart, confirmed MY numbers, not yours. Either YOUR chart is wrong, or YOUR numbers are wrong. They cannot BOTH be correct. Get it yet?...

That it takes time to achieve a goal when the opposition party is strong and entrenched. But Reagan's side won in the end, and spending shrank by 2% of GDP over his eight years. (Or 3, I forget.) Go ahead, bleat your stupidity....