Liberal Forum

Good stuff. Plus 1...

But only a moonbat would use facts and numbers to debate against something most people "know"...

Oh, look, this shameless moron is STILL making appeals to "common knowledge," even AFTER being informed that is a logical fallacy....

Sure it is. When you weren't busy defending malfeasance and then lying about it with a "nuh uh" in the face of your own words. You lack the integrity to own your OWN posts - don't try piggy backing hers, partisan hack....

Whatever helps ya sleep, kid....

One "up" year out of three. Ford was really hitting on all cylinders, right?...

Liar. Here is what you said, liar: Now, Carter only had ONE DOWN YEAR: 1980. By claiming that Reagan "inherited" an economy in a "downward spiral" (the down years was actually flat: minus 2/10ths of 1%, you exaggerating jackass), you were CLEARLY giving 1981 to Reagan. If not, liar, then you coul...

Finally, a post with some teeth from you - a post that takes a good hard punch at the OP. I was beginning to think you a dilettante and a cheap seater - my apologies. Now, I have a couple of questions for you: How do we properly account for the fact that Reagan used Keynesian economic stimulus, an...

As I made clear in the OP, retard, I don't trust people JUST LIKE YOU to be honest about the numbers. People like you will bounce between sets, depending on which best serves their current argument. I mentioned both sets of numbers, and stated that I was willing to argue my thesis, to wit: THAT CART...

As I made clear in the OP, retard, I don't trust people JUST LIKE YOU to be honest about the numbers. People like you will bounce between sets, depending on which best serves their current argument. I mentioned both sets of numbers, and stated that I was willing to argue my thesis, to wit: THAT CART...