Liberal Forum

With additions to some new staffing, the same journalist have written for the WSJ for years, probably decades. At this point, I'm convinced you're probably making this up....

Nope. Used to, though. Right up to 2008, when it became obvious that Rupert's poison had destroyed the WSJ's journalism and reduced them to propaganda....

You don't have a subscription to the Wall Street Journal, do you? You'd be very surprised who writes for it, that is, if you bothered to pay the $22.26 a month for it....

Rupee Murdoch and Steve Forbes are oligarchs silly....

The WSJ editorial page used to be reliably conservative in both economic outlook and social/political outlook. Paleoconservative, Chicago school, the works - rightist, but rational and predictable within their mindset. Reliable and always fact-based. That was before Rupert bought the place, fired t...

you are DONE clemmy. no one is buying. you are an amateur propagandist. Awake and aware, observant and perceptive people see right through your mask. You are more suited to addressing the people with an IQ below 40....

It wasn't a joke Jackhole. The guy who was running for governor of New York, sent bestiality videos to the people on his e-mail list. And you said he was qualified to be governor. And of course there is the great John Fund, who bedded the daughter of his former lover. You call him a man of high int...

What change are you referring to? The only change to the BLS methodology since 1940 was in 1994. Prior to 1994, the BLS use to ask people if they searched for work recently. If people give the BLS one of five reasons why they haven't searched for work within the last 4 weeks, they were assumed to ha...

You think the WSJ OpEd page is objective?...

I know, right? That was some funny ****....