Liberal Forum

I swear, it takes hard, hard work to be this freaking clueless....

Oh wow, that's just brilliant. Empty rhetoric and bulls*** as you ignore the most important facts about Reagan's record. What figures did you cite about job creation? Oh, that's right, you didn't cite anything at all. How does one judge a president's economic record without looking at job creatio...

You don't cite sources. You harrumph about alleged sources that you pretend you USED to cite....

You cite opinion AS fact, tard. There's a difference. What makes them "facts," in your world, is your sycophantic deference to authority. Reagan's "job creation" has been shown in Amazon Tania's post in the form of a graph, which demonstrated that it was mostly smoke and mirrors - a bunch of part t...

Smoke and mirrors. Fun with numbers. Catsup is a vegetable, the unemployed who run out of bennies are no longer "unemployed," and two guys trading debt is a "service."...

While you're in psychotic rant mode, here are more facts you completely ignored in your moonbat pseudo-analysis of Reagan's record. Real per-capita disposable income increased by 18% from 1982 to 1989, meaning the American standard of living increased by almost 20% in just seven years. The poverty ...

If some wackjob claimed that the moon is made of styrofoam, and you pointed out that few scientists believe it and noted that the overwhelming consensus is that it's made of rock, wouldn't it be stunningly stupid of that moonbat to bleat about "references to authority?" Wouldn't it be absurd if...

Citing important facts is "deference to authority?" Where's your figure on job creation under Reagan, psycho? Are you so stupid as to think that's not worth considering? Nearly 20 million new jobs were created during the recovery, increasing U.S. civilian employment by almost 20%. Unemployment...

More deference to authority. You are attacking me rather than my propositions, and deferring to the authority of alleged anonymous scholarship in the matter....

You see how gigantic your references to "authority" are, clemtard? IT'S FACTUALLY ESTABLISHED - doesn't say by whom, or demonstrate any rigor in the matter. Just parrots a claim from "facts" not in evidence. IT'S WRITTEN INTO THE HISTORY BOOKS. So would the "War of Northern Aggression" have been, ha...