Liberal Forum

That is a valid question.  Why are they not military issue to infantry units?  Your claim is they are designed for the battlefield.  So one would think they would be used on the battlefield.  But they are not.  Why?  Because they were not designed for the battlefield.  ...

thanks for the color......

And right on cue here comes duck's tag team partner. As soon as I make my first post, these two latch onto my *** and ride it....

@Blackvegetable  if these weapons are designed for battlefield use why are they not used on the battlefield? When I was in I never saw a semi auto sports rifle in the Arms Room. Hell, when I went to armorers school we didn't learn a thing about them. Never talked about them....

Couldn't tell you....I'm a Bierce man, myself.. But that is one brutal piece of writing.  ...

You know, SOME of us are having fun, here. You gotta brea up the party?  ...

The humanity. Did twain have a sister who spent time with cooper? Or did he just enjoy butt **** his inferiors?...

Stalk me much? How does a **** billionaire not know that the word is 'leveraged' and not 'levered'? I'm not a billionaire and I know that. BTW, last night Typhoid Trump verified part of the NY Times story about his taxes.  He does have $400 million in debt.    ...

Yes.  Now we are done with that. Sorry, you are incorrect.  The AR 15 Sporter, (not the Armalite AR 15 which became the M16) was specifically designed for civilians.  As the abundance of parts that were redesigned to make it legal show.   So it DID NOT FUNCTION like a military weapon. The only div...

Look at this...Veghead demanding a reposting of something. God man. You never learn. If something was already posted, then **** you. Nobody has to repost anything because you are a stupid asshole. Moron....