User avatar
bingster
04 Apr 2013 12:36 pm
bingster
User avatar
So what? For over 200 years, the Constitution was never held to rule on this at all. Why shouldn't it be left to our elected representatives, not to an unaccountable court? So, do I read your post to mean that Kennedy was wrong to say that a "right to privacy" is guaranteed by the Constitution? ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
04 Apr 2013 12:29 pm
RichClem
User avatar
What law? What are you talking about? He's not trying to get a law passed. He's trying to get a federal appeals court to reverse their decision that struck down Virginia's sodomy law as unconstitutional. So what? For over 200 years, the Constitution was never held to rule on this at all. Why shou...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
04 Apr 2013 12:23 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Apparently in Clem's imagination a 'personhood amendment' stating that life begins at conception was added to the Constitution.Clem: I wasn't referring to law or the Constitution at all, but to the reality that it's not about "a woman's body."Why didn't you respond to bingster's post?When did a firs...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
bingster
04 Apr 2013 12:21 pm
bingster
User avatar
Which quite arguably is the correct Constitutional decision, which was the accepted judicial for more than 200 years. So? Why shouldn't it be up to our elected representatives to rule on it or not? You liberal-leftists demand that almost every aspect of Americans' lives by micro-managed by law. ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
04 Apr 2013 12:19 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Which quite arguably is the correct Constitutional decision, which was the accepted judicial for more than 200 years.So?So, I don't even think you know what you're talking about.You clearly don't understand the issue....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
04 Apr 2013 12:15 pm
RichClem
User avatar
What law? What are you talking about? He's not trying to get a law passed. He's trying to get a federal appeals court to reverse their decision that struck down Virginia's sodomy law as unconstitutional. Which quite arguably is the correct Constitutional decision, which was the accepted judicial f...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
04 Apr 2013 12:10 pm
Nobody
User avatar
I always enjoy the jackazz opinion that the "life" guaranteed by the Constitution refers to a zygote in the first trimester. When did that happen exactly?Apparently in Clem's imagination a 'personhood amendment' stating that life begins at conception was added to the Constitution.Of course he didn't...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
04 Apr 2013 11:58 am
Nobody
User avatar
And he will fail to get a law like this passed.What law? What are you talking about?He's not trying to get a law passed.He's trying to get a federal appeals court to reverse their decision that struck down Virginia's sodomy law as unconstitutional.Virginia prosecutors used the sodomy law in order to...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
bingster
04 Apr 2013 11:36 am
bingster
User avatar
And he will fail to get a law like this passed. Are you expecting a politician to be flawless philosophically? Which Democrat is? Oh gosh, another lie. I don't want to legislate what people do in their bedrooms. "What women do with their own bodies?" More bulls***. The argument is over when li...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
04 Apr 2013 11:23 am
RichClem
User avatar
No perhaps about it. I posted his stance in post # 3147. Cuccinelli believes that homosexual behavior is wrong, and he believes that public policy should reflect that by outlawing certain sexual acts, nevermind that most straight people engage in those same acts. And he will fail to get a law like...
— LiberalForum Archive