User avatar
RichClem
04 Jun 2013 03:54 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Like the article says, the IRS regulations on 501 C 4 groups adopted in 1959 directly conflicts with the statute adopted in 1954. This is exactly what I have been saying, yet Clem accuses me of lying about it and spreading propaganda. Perhaps Clem can tell me what the supposed lie is? So now you'r...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
04 Jun 2013 03:41 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Hey, I have to give you credit. That's a very creative lie! Maybe that's because it's not a lie. I never had any reason to read the 1954 statute on non-profit groups. Did you? It only came to my attention that the IRS regulations were in conflict with the actual statute after this IRS situation ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
04 Jun 2013 03:17 pm
Nobody
User avatar
CREW Sues IRS for Failing to Revise Rules Governing 501 C(4) GroupsWashington, D.C. Today, (May 31) Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in United States District Court for the District of Columbia to compel the agency...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
04 Jun 2013 02:40 pm
Nobody
User avatar
...until this issue with the IRS came up, I had never read the actual statute.Hey, I have to give you credit. That's a very creative lie!Maybe that's because it's not a lie.I never had any reason to read the 1954 statute on non-profit groups.Did you?It only came to my attention that the IRS regulati...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
03 Jun 2013 02:49 pm
RichClem
User avatar
So you're seriously claiming that all those liberal groups including those associated with Obama, Clinton and countless Democrats were violating federal law? Then why weren't you complaining about them many years ago? Demanding that Dems be prosecuted? Yes. Because until this issue with the IRS c...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
03 Jun 2013 02:42 pm
Nobody
User avatar
FYI Clem:The original statute passed by Congress in 1954 requires 501 C(4) organizations to be engaged exclusively in social welfare activities.The IRS in 1959 without authority from Congress changed Congress' intent in it's regulations on 501 C(4) organizations, to be only primarily for social welf...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
03 Jun 2013 02:24 pm
Nobody
User avatar
So you're seriously claiming that all those liberal groups including those associated with Obama, Clinton and countless Democrats were violating federal law?Yes.Then why weren't you complaining about them many years ago? Demanding that Dems be prosecuted?Because until this issue with the IRS came up...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
03 Jun 2013 02:22 pm
RichClem
User avatar
I'm going to continue to ignore you now, as you clearly are out of gas and grasping at straws. Gosh, I thought this was "a Misty joint." Where'd she go? Spouted a couple blatant lies and fled. Cite one single time before the IRS scandal you claimed that liberal 501(4)'s were illegal....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
03 Jun 2013 01:00 pm
RichClem
User avatar
I'm going to continue to ignore you now, as you clearly are out of gas and grasping at straws. The last refuge of a liar and a coward. Cite one single time before the IRS scandal you claimed that liberal 501(4)'s were illegal. But now you can lie that you never saw my question, not that you'd ha...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
03 Jun 2013 12:50 pm
RichClem
User avatar
So you're going to stick to your claim that I'm lying about what the actual law says about non-profit groups. Even though you or anyone else can clearly see that it says what I said it does. Brilliant strategy. So you're seriously claiming that all those liberal groups including those associated w...
— LiberalForum Archive