User avatar
Nobody
04 Oct 2013 05:14 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Yes the house republicans speak for the districts that elected them. There just happens to be more of them this time around.And you don't think that gerrymandering has anything at all to do with that?In the last House election Democrats got 54,301,095 votes while Republicans got 53,822,442.What save...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
04 Oct 2013 05:11 pm
RichClem
User avatar
I find it curious how the House Tea Party Republicans seem to think they speak for all Americans. They don't. They only speak for their districts. They stand for the Principles of small government on which the country was founded and for the Constitution. Neither of which the liberal-left does....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
04 Oct 2013 05:10 pm
Huey
User avatar
I never said they were subservient. I merely pointed out that the House in and of itself cannot pass any bills into law.You made it sound like they can.One could say the same for the Senate and the President.They were also sent to Washington with a purpose.I find it curious how the House Tea Party R...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
04 Oct 2013 05:04 pm
Nobody
User avatar
I completely understand how things work. Shall I post the section of the constitution to you? Maybe you can show me exactly where it states the house is supposed to be subservient to the executive branch and the senate? I missed that part.I never said they were subservient. I merely pointed out that...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
04 Oct 2013 04:56 pm
RichClem
User avatar
the republicans won elections to overturn unpopular spending programs. And they won the house that controls the purse, Once again, you don't seem to understand how things work. The House drafts funding legislation, which then gets reported to the Senate, then they work together to come up with som...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
PoliticalPopUp
04 Oct 2013 04:50 pm
PoliticalPopUp
User avatar
I'm sure you do that a lot at very inappropriate times, and for no particular reason.You must be such an embarassment to your family.Actually - no - I don't - I don't know what gave you that idea - bimbo...you know nothing about my family, yet express unsubstantiated drivel about them. Here - let me...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
04 Oct 2013 04:22 pm
Huey
User avatar
I completely understand how things work. Shall I post the section of the constitution to you? Maybe you can show me exactly where it states the house is supposed to be subservient to the executive branch and the senate? I missed that part. As far as how things work I will also point out we are no...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
04 Oct 2013 04:17 pm
Nobody
User avatar
I stand by my post.I like your last answer, yup, the republicans won elections to overturn unpopular spending programs. And they won the house that controls the purse,Once again, you don't seem to understand how things work.The House drafts funding legislation, which then gets reported to the Senate...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
04 Oct 2013 04:13 pm
RichClem
User avatar
I stand by my statement. You don't get to repeal a law if you only control 1/2 of 1/3 of the government. The government wasn't shut down by Democrats for "repealing" anything. There was a one-year delay of two parts. You change a law by winning elections and taking control of the legislature and...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
04 Oct 2013 04:03 pm
Huey
User avatar
I stand by my post. I like your last answer, yup, the republicans won elections to overturn unpopular spending programs. And they won the house that controls the purse, Ps. If you wish to nitpick spelling errors I suggest you carefully check every single post you make....
— LiberalForum Archive