User avatar
RichClem
01 Jan 2014 09:51 am
RichClem
User avatar
No, I want people to have the freedom to buy whatever health insurance they choose. However, I did point out the common sense observation that the best insurance is for emergencies, not for elective health care, and most people would choose that if simple Free Market reforms were implemented. As wa...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
01 Jan 2014 09:49 am
Huey
User avatar
Waaah. Somebody got their little feelings hurt. Nah, I would rather discuss your stupidity which is boundless....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
greatnpowerfuloz
01 Jan 2014 09:45 am
greatnpowerfuloz
User avatar
My point was simple. Clem wants to go back in history to a time when medical insurance only covered emergencies. You're a dimwit who doesn't recognize sarcasm and so will try to make my entire point appear as if its about the difference between modern man and men of the 1800's. My post was not ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
01 Jan 2014 09:42 am
Huey
User avatar
So we are talking about who pays for contraceptives and your criticism is that I am not talking about nation building. No, honey, I did not miss their point. Their point was to back out out of one topic by applying another. I never play the victim Ozzie. None of you are good enough to put me...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Brattle Street
01 Jan 2014 09:41 am
Brattle Street
User avatar
Signature threads such as this one, could have some small graphic indicator as part of their title. It would help distinguish that the nature of their vehicle/medium is different from the average, regular thread....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
greatnpowerfuloz
01 Jan 2014 09:38 am
greatnpowerfuloz
User avatar
Neither Misty or cannonpointer introduced a new topic. Their rhetorical response was aimed directly at your claim that the Constitution doesn't mandate that the government should be paying for condoms. Their point had nothing to do whether or not you support nationbuilding in ****, idiot.Y ou missed...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
01 Jan 2014 09:33 am
Huey
User avatar
So when you see a group on with side with a lot of money and a group on the other side with not so much and your "tax" is only those with more, that is not redistributive? Particularly when it is used to fund financial programs to fund the other group? Yes, we are free to leave when idiots supp...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
01 Jan 2014 09:29 am
RichClem
User avatar
Someone with knowledge, understanding and common sense is a "dinosaur?" Regrettably, possibly that's true. Sure is in your case....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
01 Jan 2014 09:28 am
Huey
User avatar
It has to do with what you posted. Exactly what problem do you have with it? Honey, you are the poster who stated discussing the intelligence of modern man, aren't you? Apparently you have some serious issue with the inferior men that, dating back to John Locke and Montesquieu not to mention pe...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Brattle Street
01 Jan 2014 09:26 am
Brattle Street
User avatar
here we go again with this ****. there is no such thing as "redistributive" It is really tax, dressed up to make it sound evil. It is deliberately deceitful. This deceitful person is trying to make you believe that you didn't agree to be part of this union with the understanding of the costs involve...
— LiberalForum Archive