User avatar
Cannonpointer
19 Feb 2014 03:26 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
That's your position. Others may differ. You asked about Reagan's job creation. You have received your answer: Good, but not nearly as good as Carter. Carter wins on borrowing. Carter wins on reducing the debt to GDP ratio. Carter wins on keeping the debt low. Carter wins on jobs. Carter wins on n...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
19 Feb 2014 03:23 pm
RichClem
User avatar
I've had one for years and never seen one single column by this moonbat. Forbes magazine itself has never and would never carry something so shallow, so stupid and so incorrect. Reagan took eight years to barely beat Carter. What does your chart fail to show, as you fully intend? Carter inherite...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
19 Feb 2014 03:18 pm
Nobody
User avatar
For my buddy Clem: It seems that Republicans still have no desire to reform Fannie and Freddie. Reform bills introduced, but nothing has passed. Updated: Wednesday, June 27th, 2012 When the nation's housing crisis grew into an economic disaster, many Republicans in Washington pointed to two culpr...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
19 Feb 2014 03:17 pm
RichClem
User avatar
It's called accepted reality, psycho, underline or not. The issue is settled, not that you were ever aware it happened. And no useless chart hides the fact that your claim Carter left Reagan a strong economy was stupidly wrong. Carter created over ten million jobs in HALF the time it took Reag...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
AmazonTania
19 Feb 2014 03:12 pm
AmazonTania
User avatar
And they've done hearings and financial oversight on those entities, similar to what Glory has stated. Some of the resistance to audit these firms were lead by Congressman Maxine Waters and Gregory Meeks. Something to do with the CEO of Fannie Mae being black or something... Or maybe because he sha...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
19 Feb 2014 03:07 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Republicans controlled those committees during most of Bush's tenure, yet they constantly blame Barney Frank, who had no power at that time for the failure to reform Fannie and Freddie....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
19 Feb 2014 03:00 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Right here, Glory Hole. Do you accept FORBES as a credible source? You bragged you have a SUBSCRIPTION, did you not? http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/ ... -creation/ Reagan took eight years to barely beat Carter, when you consider the larger population he had to work with and the 2 trillio...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
AmazonTania
19 Feb 2014 03:00 pm
AmazonTania
User avatar
It's the committees, more specifically the Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, which does the oversight when it comes to matters of GSE, most specifically Fannie and Freddie. This is done by both parties, not just one....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
19 Feb 2014 02:50 pm
Nobody
User avatar
On the basis that you said that Bush only slightly expanded liberal lending policies. Google Bush's Home Ownership Society and you will see that it was one of his main priorities. And if he really wanted to reform Fannie and Freddie, there was nothing to stop him. His party had control of Congress....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
19 Feb 2014 02:50 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
This link will earn you an indulgence, my son. You have my undying gratitude. I have incorporated it into the OP by the magic of my edit power, applied in the spirit of this thread being NUMBER ONE ON GOOGLE (WOO HOO) when you search, "Carter grew the economy."...
— LiberalForum Archive