Liberal Forum

Wow, so slapping the term "meme" on that refutes documented history, right? Because that deal has been recorded in many accounts of the Reagan presidency. Now do your little troll dance....

Nice dodge, kid. Your response to, "What would be a Keynesian tax cut" is. I did NOT! Prove it! You don;t even know what it is! Laborers? MARXISM! Keep dancing, kid....

Apparently, the person I responded to did. He brought up the laffer curve. Do you not care about the laffer curve? Link? Abner? Is that you, Abner?...

Good link. Great meme....

How typically stupid that you call that "Reagan's" tax hike. It was Tip O'Neil's and Democrats' demand, to which Reagan only conceded in exchange for spending cuts that Tip O'Neil promised. O'Neil broke his word, and Reagan called the deal the biggest mistake of his presidency....

Who care what Eisenhower knew or didn't about Economics. No one except the monbat left is even considering such a stupid tax rate. Are you advocating it? If not, what's your point?...

Yes, you did try that. Here, try again. 1) You didn't cite when I've supported a Keynesian tax cut 2) You don't know what one is. 3) And you're wrong about me not wanting to help, shades of Marxism, "laborers. So you're zero for three....

Thank you. every time I point that out about Reagan's tax increases on labor to offset his cuts on capital, your bedfellows go to lying and screeching and flapping their effeminate arms. But I did not "ignore" that - any more than I "ignored" that Obama owned a red bicycle when he was 11. The chal...

Yes, laborers. Shades of MARXISM. Actual LABORERS! Anyhow, nice dodge....

typical that your intellect is so easily exposed for what it is, anytime I care to. come on trollscum, show me some propaganda crap that I can't dismantle at will...