Liberal Forum

So, you just changed your tune. The "little guy" had MORE say under the states - not less. You blamed the victims - typical of republicans (and if you don't want to identify as one, stop identifying yourself as one). So, we are now at a form of capitalism which was being held down and disempowere...

Governments tax, son. All of them. Always. In fact, that's how they get their money - you can google it. Try to get over it....

Up until that point and well into the 1800's the regulation of business was at the state level....

By "if the government steps out"....do you mean in total....including being a taxing authority?...

There's a fly in your ointment, son. For starters, "pretty much" means NOT. So it admits that you're incapable of pointing to a single example of what you claim occured. In the second place, our Constitution was not ratified until what? 1789? That's "late 1700s." And true capitalism stopped abou...

We pretty much had Capitalism in the US until the late 1700's, then the "little guy" started bitching for government regulations....

So your claim is that there IS a thing like what you have described, called capitalism, but WE do not have it. Okay. Who does? If no one does, who did? When? During what years - and know that I have every intention of proving you full of ****, my little pony. You are making a pony claim, balon...

We don't currently have true capitalism, capitalism is a free market, you're arguing against what you wish to have the most....

You clearly do not understand my THESIS, diatribe breath. As stated, if the government steps out, we no longer HAVE capitalism. We're back to free enterprise. Free enterprise is the natural state of humanity. Find two people, you've found free enterprise. Capitalism cannot EXIST without the as...

I didn't see anything in your diatribe against the concept of capitalism, only that the government currently controls it. That's not capitalism’s fault. Like I said your aurgument seems to be against the government....