User avatar
onlyaladd
16 Feb 2016 05:25 pm
onlyaladd
User avatar
You yourself admitted it's calculated the same way since 1994. I assume you were telling the truth there and lying now. It's up to Trump and you his defender to prove it's one of the 3 or 4 or 5 random numbers he pulled out of his ***. Until then it is as you claim, calculated the same as it has bee...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
16 Feb 2016 05:25 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Obsessive little creep....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
16 Feb 2016 05:21 pm
golfboy
User avatar
You've ALREADY responded to me directly, you ignorant slut. Run away Misty, it's all you can do when you get called out for lying, and can't defend your position. As if I care. All you're proving here, is that you can't ignore me....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
16 Feb 2016 05:20 pm
Nobody
User avatar
I know this little **** is trying to goad me into responding directly to him because I am seeing lots of these: Responding to the filthy little liar is as useful as repeatedly bashing ones head into a brick wall, and I have no desire to do either....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
16 Feb 2016 05:18 pm
golfboy
User avatar
I'm not playing any semantic games. You lied. I called you on it. Trump WAS talking about the official unemployment rate, and said the government is lying. That's the WHOLE **** POINT. And he did not say it was "more like 42%". Another lie. He said it was "probably 20%". In liberaland, 20% is th...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
16 Feb 2016 05:16 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Now he's trying to turn it around on you by playing his little semantics game. That's why I have the little **** on ignore. He will never admit that Trump was talking about the official unemployment rate issued by the BLS which counts people who want to work and are actively seeking employment. NOT...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
16 Feb 2016 05:12 pm
golfboy
User avatar
You want to prove it's not "probably 20%" or do we just take your word for it?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
onlyaladd
16 Feb 2016 05:11 pm
onlyaladd
User avatar
Neither of which is the accurate number for unemployment. He said "my guess is it's 20%" False He said he's seen figures aa high as 42% False. None of those are unemploment numbers. He lied. You keep defending it....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
16 Feb 2016 05:10 pm
golfboy
User avatar
"The unemployment rate is probably 20 percent" 20% is the new 42%...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
16 Feb 2016 05:08 pm
golfboy
User avatar
Nope, he said it was more like 20%. In liberaland 20 is the new 42....
— LiberalForum Archive