Liberal Forum

No, the Russians probably aren't done. As it has been pointed out the Russians have tampered with our elections for decades, as we have done to other countries FOR DECADES. WE probably aren't done tampering with elections. Plus, tamper is too stronng a word. Did we tamper with Israel's elections...

I am not at all demanding that Podesta be charged, let alone imprisoned. Yes, I am speculating, albeit from an informed opinion. On top of what's recently revealed, there is obvious Clinton corruption and felonies going back many years. That is proven beyond doubt. I want a thorough investigation ...

She lies. I don't care for the fact that Russia tried to **** with our election. And it seems that TrumpCo. used that fact to their advantage. Republicans don't seem to care, because it wasn't hurting their side, this time.... If and when that happens, people like Clem will be running around with...

ROFL at the people who still think that this is all about sour grapes over the election. Like I said in my last post. The Russians aren't done tampering in our democracy. Ask Marco Rubio. You can look the other way now, but when they target your party you'll be changing your tune....

Like the trump campaign Russian ties I treat Podesta the same way. Until we solid proof we have nothing but speculation that changes by the day and does nothing but the sheeple of both side riled up for no reason. As the commercial used to say where (the ****) is the beef?...

Without getting into the Clinton fees, which I'd have to take a lot of time to research, it's my understanding that Podesta profited by $35 million. I've watched and read about ordinary businessmen, and it is all but impossible for him to have earned that unless he was bringing political influence ...

How can I show you evidence of something that is not provable? What I can say is that it sure didn't help the Democrats. I don't disagree that the decision to run such a flawed candidate was a big mistake. I'm not shifting anything. I don't care for the fact that Russia tried to **** with our el...

True. Trouble is, liberals can't handle a reality like that. I had a comical experience with a group of local liberals who 1) were appallingly ignorant about very, very basic facts yet insisted stridently that they were correct and I was wrong, and 2) were so reality averse that they obviou...

That was Clinton's standard fees. But it’s important to keep in mind that Bill Clinton regularly delivers speeches for fees of $500,000 or higher — such as a $750,000 speech in Hong Kong in 2011, paid for by a Swedish communications company, and a $600,000 speech in the Netherlands, also in 2011,...

Which doesn't answer my question. I would understand if Clinton or any president got high fees from some grateful country or business for general good performance. That happens. Russian money doesn't fall into that category. What did the Clinton's and their cronies get for receiving 10's of mill...