User avatar
Nobody
22 May 2017 02:18 am
Nobody
User avatar
...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 May 2017 01:47 am
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Most clinton critics started as clinton supporters. I am one such. This would be the first time in history that red herrings were employed. Getting too close to the clintons gets people dead all the time....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 May 2017 01:45 am
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Meh. I find it funny. You bought a ban hammer - don't spare MY feelings! (It's still outrageously funny)...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
22 May 2017 01:40 am
Nobody
User avatar
Not really what I had in mind for this thread....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
22 May 2017 01:37 am
Nobody
User avatar
A few things I have learned about the Seth Rich case. His name did not appear as a recipient on any of the leaked DNC emails, which means they wouldn't have been on his computer. According to his father, he was a big supporter of Hillary Clinton, so it made no sense for him to leak emails that wou...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 May 2017 01:10 am
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Absolutely. Turning .000005 into a steep incline over a period of more than a century - and fools actually buying it, then preening that the "science is on their side?" If that's not **** hilarious, what is? Seriously - think how stupid that really is - math wants its math back!...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
22 May 2017 01:07 am
Nobody
User avatar
Seriously?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 May 2017 01:07 am
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Yes, while you were covering your ears and saying la la la la la. You've seen white water, vince foster, multiple rape allegations (can't trust bitches when they cry rape), multiple sudden death syndromes, the open and public fixing of the email crimes, the open and public selling of influence - yo...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
22 May 2017 01:03 am
Nobody
User avatar
I've seen that 'evidence.'...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 May 2017 12:54 am
Cannonpointer
User avatar
I find this humorous. The difference between 350 PPM and 400 PPM of atmospheric C02 concentration, expressed by a reasonably educated layman, is this: .000035 vs. .00004. The difference, expressed by a bureaucrat posing as a scientist, looks more like this: Edit: MY BAD! That chart shows ONE DE...
— LiberalForum Archive