Liberal Forum

Pretty much!...

There is my troll!!!!  ...

It is absurd for the effort to be against a particular rifle when far more people are killed by knives and cutting instruments.  Is this because of an unnatural fear of firearms?  Or more likely a political agenda?  Or being fed misinformation and propaganda by politicians and the MSM?  ...

OK...but that's not a point.....it's a "factoid".... the next question is, how is such a comparison useful.... only as propaganda....  ...

No..that's ****...."Assault-style" sporting goods rifles are the most glaring symptom of our irrational approach to ALL private forearms ownership... One of the issues with these "sporting goods" is the leverage it affords the former sportsman and law abiding gun owner when he gets a hair across hi...

It seems you are the only one who is having issues.  It is quite simple.  Less are shot with a rifle than get stabbed with a knife.  That also means far less are shot with what you erroneously call an assault rifle because they are counted in the rifle category. From the OP According to the UCR, 1...

So, for your benefit, let me break it down for you... You aren't qualified to judge the merits of any side of a debate. When pressed, you resort to "everyone knows" or "I'm not your google" - usually within 4 posts...you have no skills, and show no particular capacity for analysis. as to the obvi...

no....he limited it to rifles because liberals to freak out over rifles. It was just for some perspective on how rare rifle deaths are. very simple. and blah blah bad people etc. useless words....

Let's see In unambiguous language, state the point of your thread....

you presumed to change it because you could not dispute the point.  ...