User avatar
FOS
14 Oct 2020 03:51 pm
FOS
User avatar
do you have some reason to presume that 'unspevified' heavily skews towards assault weapons? Cause actually it would seem the opposite. If someone is killed by a .223 its pretty distinctive...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
14 Oct 2020 03:51 pm
Blackvegetable
User avatar
uhhhh...no.......
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
14 Oct 2020 03:49 pm
Huey
User avatar
That is not all that was said.  But, your own source said you are wrong.   carry on...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
14 Oct 2020 03:49 pm
Blackvegetable
User avatar
IT could also fall under "unspecified" if no record was made of whatever delivered the fatal shot......
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
14 Oct 2020 03:47 pm
Blackvegetable
User avatar
No...I remember someone telling me that the AR-15 Sporting Item was "heavily redesigned"...a wee, little fella he was.... wait... hold on.... IT WAS YOU!...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Isabel
14 Oct 2020 03:45 pm
Isabel
User avatar
So you can't support your claim. Glad to see you admit it.  ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
FOS
14 Oct 2020 03:44 pm
FOS
User avatar
what? stats are irrelevant. all assault weapons are rifles not all rifles are assault weapons. Its definition....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Isabel
14 Oct 2020 03:43 pm
Isabel
User avatar
Prove that the stats cited make that claim....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
FOS
14 Oct 2020 03:42 pm
FOS
User avatar
because assault weapons is a subset of rifle label...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Isabel
14 Oct 2020 03:40 pm
Isabel
User avatar
They why is he citing stats for "rifles"? And disregarding stats for "unspecified weapons"/  ...
— LiberalForum Archive