Liberal Forum

Differfent lowers, bolt assemblies, etc.  That is not modified.  That would pretty much DEFINE "modified", Verbal... The weapon you are discussing was specifically designed for the civilian market. No...it was not...the ENTIRE POINT of modifying the military design was to expand the market for that ...

I have presented an informed, on the mark case.  You have never fired, held, repaired, or field stipped one either of those weapons.  You can not verbalized why you want a weapon banned.   Again, modern military weapons like the one Rittenhous's LOOKS like are BANNED ya moron.  That is why these we...

Dwarf, Don't bother.. You opened with your cowardice... The rest is irrelevant.  ...

No, not modified.  Differfent lowers, bolt assemblies, etc.  That is not modified.  Modified would be what was done to the M 16 or AK 47s way back in the day.  The weapon you are discussing was specifically designed for the civilian market....

The rest of the post No questions until you explain why you want to ban them.  Modern day military automatics are banned.  Those manufactured prior to 86 can be purchased with tens of thousands of dollars and a 6 month to a year anal probe background check.  The weapons displayed on this thread do ...

Holy ****, are you stupid.. The weapon had already been designed, developed, and MODIFIED....

No, he didn't.  That weapon was manufacture after 86.  That would be illegal.  ...

  No questions Then **** off....

No questions until you explain why you want to ban them.  Modern day military automatics are banned.  Those manufactured prior to 86 can be purchased with tens of thousands of dollars and a 6 month to a year anal probe background check.  The weapons displayed on this thread do not come from that gro...

He didn't buy a weapon specifically designed for civilian use...he bought a weapon designed for military use..  ...