Liberal Forum

Yes, you are back to appearance.  If they were designed for combat they would be standard issue in the military.  They are not.  Why?  Because they are semi automatic.  You don't like the weapons because their appearance is why you claim a certain group of people are attracted to them. You can not ...

So you wont answer. Didn't think so. Darth Evader....

I have answered your questions.  Just because you don't like the answers doesn't mean I did not answer them.  Also, my citations, when you don't edit them. kick your ***.  Like the last one I posted....

You are back to ban them for their appearance No...only you are, you **** moron.......

You keep saying that while running from all questions... and being gobsmacked by citations...  ...

Ps @Blackvegetable   Notice how my source, a source you use often, describes the weapons you whin about: Most current fully automatic trigger groups will not fit their semi-automatic firearm look-alike counterparts Semi automatic firearm look alike counterparts. You are back to ban them for their...

This is my thread waffle boy.  I will respond to whom ever I want.  That is your rule for your threads.  Get over it Askhole.  You are going down in a defeat.  ...

You asked me to show a citation that shows that the weapons you whine about that are designed for the battlefield were banned if made after 86 or heavily restricted if before.  I did.  The point is they are already banned or heavily restricted. No..that's not what that means....it means it was "rele...

Quiet, turtle.... Play dead... Good turtle......

Your evasions aren't working. I know that the question was asked to you, and you know that the question was asked to you.  Listen closely...focus...focus........focus: Huey asked you, not me. You evaded, thus you are a coward...as usual.  That is all.  1. You will ignore that you were asked the...