Liberal Forum

  ...tavy gets SOME of it...i believe the republicrat-level dummy hinted he was some kind of 'economics teacher'.....so he had a brief outline/$piel that included some truth...[which is rare, admittedly] ...but i don't believe he understands that money is a function of law [i don't think you do eit...

since when does self evident results need proving? Mob rule deniers demand it and because they can invent threories to sustain doubt, nobody can disprove the negative facts life is limited to mutually evolving so far....

...i am not aware that any truly honest intelligent egalitarian money system has ever existed... so what?... [you appear to rule out 'progress'?!] ... can YOU 'prove' anything YOU write?...    ...

It's the Proud Boys doing  ...

 ...

Even if the Incan system fits into peepee's definition of an "honest" system, which I sincerely doubt, the conditions for that are far removed from what we have today. There is no feasible way to revert to that class of archaic systems. That being said, you do bring up a good point about the pseud...

You monetary ignoramus...

I cant show EXACTLY that but I CAN say that the INCA had no money. NOTHING analagous to such a thing. Your taxes were paid in labor by what you did. If you were a brewrr you spent so much of your labor went to the King who distributed it.. Even TODAY in remote regions the bridges are rebuilt on the ...

Can you prove anything you wrote? Let's start with this: "In an honest system some will rise as leaders by consent/affirmation...  they may acquire 10 or even 100 times more than average...not **** thousands of times more" Show me an "honest system," and where this "honest system" exists (or has ...

You can talk theory Pee Pee The magnificent. And it is fun to follow..like a fun game.. but until you a have billion dollars.. and you can make a difference.  What in the hell are you wasting your time on it for.. life is way to short. F the money pee pee.  f  the money.  ...