Liberal Forum

It isn't an argument, dwarf.. You have no idea what one looks like.. Which makes you so Usefool.  ...

@Blackvegetable  I will leave you with this argument.  Keep Running, Forrest/   ...

Yeah, it is an argument.  You can't refute so you hide.  If you have nothing else it has been fun curbstomping you yet again.  ...

Who said he had to carry them all...put them in a steamer trunk with wheels....couldn't tell him from a tourist. 2.  If the bill in the OP was passed I just made an argument demonstrate how easy a man could use LEGAL Magazines to carry 57 plus rounds and you wouldn't even know it.   That is STILL no...

Well, a man would not bring 600 1 shot derringers for a couple of reason: 1:  To many to carry. 2.  If the bill in the OP was passed I just made an argument demonstrate how easy a man could use LEGAL Magazines to carry 57 plus rounds and you wouldn't even know it.   Keep in mind the VA Tech Shoot...

Diagram this alleged argument of yours... Before repeating your Stupid, the fact that a man can just bring 600 single shot derringers didn't persuade the ATF to make submachine guns available to all.  ...

You still have not offered a counter argument based on what I wrote. With the law you support in place a person could legally carry 57 or more rounds in multiple LEGAL MAGAZINES.  This law does nothing to reduce mass murders as I have just displayed....

Repeating it doesn't answer the question, nor does it make your rant an argument, 37X Try something else..  ...

  With the law you support in place a person could legally carry 57 or more rounds in multiple LEGAL MAGAZINES.  This law does nothing to reduce mass murders as I have just displayed....

Let the record show that Dwarf STILL doesn't answer questions, or acknowledge his own words......