Liberal Forum

Dwarf, You worked vaingloriously in defense of Grifty's lie...period.. No one but you cares about your reframe. Do you understand that the probability of wind is based on the track? Do  you find it odd that both "paths" are **** the same? "Hurricane" and "winds of 0-35 mph" are not the same thing...

@Blackvegetable   My, the path looks exactly the same....

I don't care what Trump said.  I said nothing about Al getting hit harder.  that is all on trump.  You are now reaching because you know I was I stand by comments.   Do you understand that the probability of wind is based on the track? Do  you find it odd that both "paths" are **** the same?  ...

What is it that you insist you were correct about? This is the same image Grifty was obliged to deface... Do you understand the difference between "path of hurricane" and "5% probability of winds from 0-36mph"? NOAA, and the rest of America, does......

That's nice.  I said nothing like what trump said.  You would have to show that.   At the time, the NWS's forecast guidance showed only a very small risk (about 5 percent) of tropical-storm-force winds for a small portion of Alabama. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Pretty much what I posted.  Thanks.   ...

Trump wrongly tweeted on Sept. 1 that Alabama would "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated," though the state was not within the National Hurricane Center's "cone of uncertainty" - the zone most likely to be affected. The National Weather Service forecast office in Birmingham, responding...

I have elaborated.  You have offered nothing.  I'll wait..... ...

Not if you are running from elaborating on your own "evidence".. And it is total ****....your comments only occur in the context of Grifty's lie....

I am defending the accuracy of my comments.  Successfully....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olmcREEDkTc...