Liberal Forum

You got the rules.  It is quite simple.  You made an assertion in narrative forum and were called on it.  Now you refuse to state the position you are claiming I have concerning the Jan 6th riot, you refuse to post quotes and links, and refuse to support your assertion at all. To be quite clear I d...

First post - rhetorical questions.  Best to abandon the thread to the ***, huey. You SURELY learned that calling the ****** out just gets more ****** in response. Ya just watched me humiliate the *** for ten pages.   ...

You should be familiar with these rules hence you can't bitch about them: Dwarf, What I am looking for is the rule under which I am, in any way, obliged to participate.  Then I want you to post the Rules of Engagement for BOTH parties in these situations,, lest there be any confusion moving forw...

OK...don't be a coward jack off. There now.  lol...

No problem as you continue to run from your comments.  You should be familiar with these rules hence you can't bitch about them: No narratives.. All assertions must be supported by citations. And I am adding if you are using quotes: 1.  The full quote must be posted. 2.  The quote link must be ...

If you want me to participate, post the rules....

@Blackvegetable   you sure are posting to this thread a lot but you have yet to make your case supporting your statement.  I will have to go with you are: 1.  Lying or 2.  Confused about who said what or 3.  Dumb. ...

I want to see the Rules.  ...

@Blackvegetable   this is your shot to prove that you have the ability to not only back up your statements but make a case.  As in your PG thread no BS.  You may follow those same rules.  ...

@Blackvegetable   PG is not where the discussion is.  You made a comment.  Now back it up.  What about my Jan 6th position makes me a toady?...