Liberal Forum

Oppressed is your term.  I prefer discouraged and ignored.  If reasoning with their better sensibilities doesn't suffice then at some point the discouragement is still not best described by the term "oppression", rather it would more aptly be described as a bullet to the head.  My constitutional rig...

He's probably the kind of guy that would raise hell about my broken down cars.  Like my drunken relatives have NO RIGHT to a safe place to sleep it off - amirite?  ...

Maybe you can sway this guys thinking as you did mine.  If he is a thinker, I am still not convinced...

Are you serving exhibition #35Z0C, "Libertardian gets owned by fascist?"...

freedom is only possible with Tyranny. I don't see the dichotomies that you were programmed to see. Those who would restrict your freedom must be oppressed...right?...

I'm the opposite of a NAZI.  I believe in freedom not tyranny. And Fascism is little different from Bolshevism.  Fascism is just socialism which favors a portion of the population.  More specifically it normally means favoring only those in society who produce for the collective more than they cons...

And yes when I compare you to nazis I mean it as a compliment. Cause I'm a nazi. The loyalty of labor unions should be to workers. This is only possible if it is integrated with the state. Otherwise they may serve a foreign power such as bolsheviks....

Sounds like you are thinking of something like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Labour_Front...

Should be "you're."  ...

It the case of labor unions it is due to the right of their members to freely enter into any contracts they choose without undue government interference. The members of the union decided it was in their best interest to negotiate their contract as a group. Union contracts or "collective bargaining" ...