Liberal Forum

"Prohibiting censorship is neither censorship nor content control." That means Musk has reinvested his wealth into the public interest.  Seems like a good service to me....

No, it isn't. Prohibiting censorship is neither censorship nor content control. It is merely making the game rules of PUBLIC corporations conform to PUBLIC policy.  It is against public policy for banks - even private ones - to discriminate based on race. Is that government control of a bank's len...

You do not hear from me with cause. I have ceased to post on this board because of Cannonpointer, who calls me all of the time curry n****r. How do you think he might feel if I called him beef eater n****r? I do my job. Posting to the board is optional. I am saying to heck with all of this place, ...

You sound like the troll....

I'm not saying that freedom of speech is not important. The truth though is that Twitter can notify it's content regulations. The alternative would be for the government to do it. That remains the danger IMHO. Elon Musk is going to be in that role. Furthermore, there are legal restrictions on free s...

Do you sincerely believe that a billionaire who makes 100% of his income from the financial/government sector is anti financial/government sector? I believe Musk is a trojan horse, diverting attention from useful actions with an ersatz deus ex machina mirage.   ...

Twitter wasn't political until democrats used it as a weapon against Trump.   ...

Can't see the future. Just know politics is a beast....

Musk is a muti-billionaire who has made no money to my knowledge outside of carbon credits and tax credits - nothing useful, nothing having to do with consumers but rather, having to do with tax payers and cozy wall street reationships.  A man allowed to do such things - I said it: allowed - is no ...

Liberals can create a new progressive chat service. Call it litter.  ...