Liberal Forum

We already know that he is a failure and a loser. My challenge is to expose him to him alone. Nothing is worse for a narcissist to have to look at themselves for the fraud they are. ...

I challenge bv to a cinnamon huffing contest. BV must post a short video of himself consuming a heaping tablespoon of cinnamon with no chaser. If he fails to do this, he is exposed as a failure and a loser...

I know it is known to all. I am not trying to expose what is already known about him, that's been well-established. What I am trying to do is shove his arrogant stupidity up his ***, once and for all. Since he loves acting superior over others, evading questions while belting out 600 questions/deman...

Exactly. He is a craven piece of ****. This is known to all. ...

I don't have to prove **** to him. He forfeited any explanation or rights to receive any input whatsoever the moment that he decided cheating should be a part of the conditions.  Not my problem. ...

You proved your case already to everyone except him.  You will never prove it to him. There is no chopping block.  ...

Forced that you simply mod the challenge without his consent. Do you remember the details of the challenge? Neither of us have to do anything. The evidence just needs to be examined by a mod whether he likes it or not. That's it. I have just as much to lose as him, I am also on the chopping block....

you are a coward...

Forced uder what conditions? I cannot squeeze blood from a turnip or manhood from the gender confused. If I could force that weak ***, he would not be a weak ***. ...

No questions, dick sucker.   ...