User avatar
Huey
17 Jun 2022 08:24 am
Huey
User avatar
Been there, done that. point?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
17 Jun 2022 08:23 am
Blackvegetable
User avatar
Please promise to be in the First Wave....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Neo
17 Jun 2022 08:21 am
Neo
User avatar
Ammophobic are far more pathetic. Laws only restrict the law abiding.   ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
17 Jun 2022 08:19 am
Huey
User avatar
If you would like to discuss it you can.  This is about weather or not the flounders could envision any other than a musket that had to be reloaded after every shot. James Madison could.  ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
17 Jun 2022 08:19 am
Blackvegetable
User avatar
 You **** Ammosexuals are hopeless. Go join the service, play with your gunny things.    ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Neo
17 Jun 2022 08:19 am
Neo
User avatar
There is no solution outside of banning all guns from public ownership. The crazed would switch to mowing down crowds with SUVs. When we ban large vehicles the deranged will predictably switch to explosives and poisons. When we ban gasoline and any chemicals that have potential lethality the homicid...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
17 Jun 2022 08:18 am
Blackvegetable
User avatar
Post the 2nd Amendment. ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Blackvegetable
17 Jun 2022 08:17 am
Blackvegetable
User avatar
Only for approved grievances, right?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Skans
17 Jun 2022 08:15 am
Skans
User avatar
In 1789, there were already multi-shot weapons: They clearly had pistols, sidearms, rifles, shotguns, and muskets.  In addition, they had rockets, cannons, bombs, and varying explosive devices.  This is why they chose the word "Arms", and not musket, or cannon, or rocket or any narrowly defined ty...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Neo
17 Jun 2022 08:13 am
Neo
User avatar
In other words, you concede the point. I accept your defeat.   ...
— LiberalForum Archive