Liberal Forum

And I have yet to post my personal opinion of it.   But along the lines of your new argument they SCOTUS in 1973 reversed damn near TWO HUNDRED years of tradition and precedent....

No..... It can't. And you have rules about that. It's time for your case.  ...

No, InstantRecall. It is not new....

To quote you it will become clear when you answer it.  But, I have told you why you won't answer it. ...

And I have yet to post my personal opinion of it.   But along the lines of your new argument they SCOTUS in 1973 reversed damn near TWO HUNDRED years of tradition and precedent.    ...

I never saw you post the point of your question.   ...

Tiny, They just REVERSED a SCOTUS precedent which had stood for 50 years.  **** idiot.  ...

Now you are mixing constitutional opinions with personal opinions.  Pick which one you want to discuss.    ...

Again, being a **** sockpuppet, you evade the point. This is a medical matter involving the only direct stakeholder and the advisor of her choice. It is not a matter in which the State holds an interest. It lacks standing. Your constitutional wanking is a pretext to restrict a woman's choice.  ...

I know I did respond.  No, it doesn't install in the trigger assembly.  The lower receiver needs to be drilled, and the part pinned in place.  It acts like a trip - causing the hammer to drop when the bolt carrier closes.  What you described would cause a slam fire at best, but wouldn't really work ...