Liberal Forum

This has been explained to you numerous times.  When Colt acquired the rights to the Armalite Rifle 15 they changed the name to Colt c601 which the government then branded M16.  They still retained rights to the name AR 15 and applied to the semi auto that was not designed for the battlefield.  Spen...

 SHEET!    and all this time.. I thought they were watching me?        i get this.  ...

GO read that citation you struck thru, moron.  You never said anything about Remington.  Stoner went to Remington.  Remington got it right because the army wanted a lighter round with more velocity. If you had read the citation you would see that the .223 was first the.222.  And to kick it off it i...

Shorty, If the SP1 is a design DISTINCT from the AR-15, why is the part STAMPED "COLT AR-15 Model: SP1"?...

Well...I'm just a nice fella.  Hell...ask Cyndi...she'll vouch for me.  But you're right about the Dahmer comparison, although "antisocial" is one of the things list of things I would have diagnosed poor Jeff with.  But speaking of Jeff...y'know Jeff and his old man had a squirrelly, off and on rel...

@Blackvegetable  ...

You babbled on about a .222 round. In the course of that, your citation confirmed everything I have said about the .223, the 5.56 and the development of the AR 15...

Shorty, Had you read the original citation you claimed to have read, you'd have known ALL of this.... That is why I did....

I have given you the history and the "why".  Hell, you haven't addressed where I tore your case apart.  This is just for my entertainment.  ...

None of this twaddle changes any of the facts I've presented, nor does it address the arguments fashioned therefrom.  ...