Liberal Forum

and the jury found he was not liable for rape No....that is NOT what the jury found... but sexual abuse, which was the jury’s basis for the damages award… For the specific act alleged.....digital penetration. They awarded 2 million because they considered it an act of rape.... It is the SPECIF...

What evidence do you have of the judge's "corruption"?  ...

It is a range of offenses.....

OH, and the JUDGE was TOTALLY CORRUPT!!  Once the SCOTUS tears it a NEW ***, you can grovel....

and the jury found he was not liable for rape, but sexual abuse, which was the jury’s basis for the damages award… YOU....BRAINDEAD....LUMP....OF...****...  ...

NO LINK, huh?? As always, you demand of others, and when asked of you, you RUN!!           ...

    That’s a good one…...

which is it? Remember, no feefees or opines…    ...

JuCo, **** YOUR QUESTIONS...

Guilty of what?   ...