Liberal Forum

I read the first paragraph.  That is all I needed to see.   AN another question.  Just make a case, ******.  ...

1.  Acknowledge he is not being prosecuted right now or post the date the trial started. 2.  I have no clue why he is talking to the AG.  Let me know when you find out. 3.  **** you.  You have been ignoring facts since this thread started.  Right now you have created a diversion from the fact the ...

I don't  know who that is or pertinence..  ...

When you explain why he is talking to the AG of NH. Ignoring that fact does not make you "correct"..  ...

Definitely  in the rights.. https://youtu.be/HoLhKJuGhK0?is=5Zd43mUmgenVSddx...

Duh Done.. Law and Order on No Holds Barred. Bv I second the motion for dismissal  without prejudice..  ...

You demanded it. I produced it. Now you're trying to make reference to text you haven't read. Now it is your turn... ( :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:  :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:) Why was Kaplan obliged to opine? He says so....

You ca post the pertinent parts you want me to pay attention to.  All I know is according to NY State law and the Jury Verdict, Trump was not liable for rape. I am done with this one....

Kaplan shouldn't have told the jury to go by the NY State legal definition of rape.  He did.  And theory did as well.  Hewould not have been convicted of rape in a criminal trial.  ...

  Try that again.  Oh, my stand was he was not being prosecuted as we speak.  I was correct,  You lost and you are not man enough admit that. **** off....