Liberal Forum

They very much are... There will be massive gaps in your knowledge, which will require remediation. That involves you accepting objective facts. That is a fruitless endeavor. If you tell me on what **** sources you relied at the time, I'll quickly be able to figure out what you don't know. This ...

I don't want nothing bad to happen to guy but this is a better place without him....

It is not just a question, particularly when you already know the answer. The question is used to point out that those that did not watch it can not possibly understand what was going on.  So that rule applies to you and FOX.    ...

That's a question, not a rule. It is also an illustration of your commitment to the truth of the matter. You were told to avert your eyes, and given a set of flimsy reasons....the very reasons you continue to give for averting your eyes....

Waiting for you to go there.  My sources back then are not relevant.  What is relevant is the Aug 6th  2001 briefing was historical in nature, reflecting on threats mostly from the Clinton era, with no specifics on using planes as weapons. Waiting on you to refute that.  ...

Assuming that work is soiling yourself, coward.....

How much of the Jan 6th hearings did you watch?  ...

...

My work is done here.  You got nuttin' but talk.    ...

No, this is: The White Godess....  ...