Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The last president who went his entire presidency without ordering U.S. forces into combat at all.
The last president who went his entire presidency without ordering U.S. forces into combat at all.
By Vegas
13 Aug 2026 1:48 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
13 Aug 2026 1:48 pm
None. There has never been a US president in our history without inserting our military into some kind of action around the world.
How come we can't have a strong military for defense only? I am good with having a formidable military..for defense only. The two are mutually exclusive. It is very possible to have unparalleled military might and peace at the same time.
How come we can't have a strong military for defense only? I am good with having a formidable military..for defense only. The two are mutually exclusive. It is very possible to have unparalleled military might and peace at the same time.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
13 Aug 2026 2:37 pm
Vegas » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ None. There has never been a US president in our history without inserting our military into some kind of action around the world.
How come we can't have a strong military for defense only? I am good with having a formidable military..for defense only. The two are mutually exclusive. It is very possible to have unparalleled military might and peace at the same time.
Remember how fierce-sounding "battle hardened troops" is . . .
How can we practice and rotate munitions stock without a playground?
Defense only . . .
Are you crazy? 
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
13 Aug 2026 4:31 pm
Trump's attack on Iran was defensive.Vegas » Today, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ None. There has never been a US president in our history without inserting our military into some kind of action around the world.
How come we can't have a strong military for defense only? I am good with having a formidable military..for defense only. The two are mutually exclusive. It is very possible to have unparalleled military might and peace at the same time.
13 Aug 2026 4:35 pm
That was my answer. There was no such president.Vegas » Today, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ None. There has never been a US president in our history without inserting our military into some kind of action around the world.
How come we can't have a strong military for defense only? I am good with having a formidable military..for defense only. The two are mutually exclusive. It is very possible to have unparalleled military might and peace at the same time.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
13 Aug 2026 4:36 pm
You are a moron.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
13 Aug 2026 4:37 pm
America is a powerful enough force to battle-harden our troops as we go.DeezerShoove » Today, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Remember how fierce-sounding "battle hardened troops" is . . .
How can we practice and rotate munitions stock without a playground?
Defense only . . .
It worked for FDR.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
13 Aug 2026 4:40 pm
:rofl:
Which one?
13 Aug 2026 4:47 pm
Cannonpointer » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ America is a powerful enough force to battle-harden our troops as we go.
It worked for FDR.
Soon our robots will Five Unalive them anyway.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
13 Aug 2026 8:10 pm
No, they won't.
Not unless there is big, big money behind each robot.
And in that case, the cheap robots will swarm and kill them.
There's no way to beat the math. The nation who MIC works for the government will beat the nation whose government works for the MIC, every **** time.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
13 Aug 2026 8:23 pm
STFU YOU POS COWARD ****** BOY ***
13 Aug 2026 11:40 pm
Cannonpointer » Today, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑ No, they won't.
Not unless there is big, big money behind each robot.
And in that case, the cheap robots will swarm and kill them.
There's no way to beat the math. The nation whose MIC is owned by its government will beat the nation whose government is owned by its MIC, every **** time.
Well, ****... that makes us weak as hell. No wait a tick...
I recall that old saw: "Our tax dollars at work."
We own the military, right? The military does our bidding.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
14 Aug 2026 6:27 am
Want a REASON WHY we often need to be the first to attack??Vegas » Yesterday, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ None. There has never been a US president in our history without inserting our military into some kind of action around the world.
How come we can't have a strong military for defense only? I am good with having a formidable military..for defense only. The two are mutually exclusive. It is very possible to have unparalleled military might and peace at the same time.
Dec.7th, 1941. Pearl Harbor, HI.
WE as a nation were in an ISOLATIONIST POSTURE and lost bigly for nearly a year. WE only had ~600,000 men in uniform at that time. Had the BATTLE OF MIDWAY been a success by the Japanese, there is a good chance we would have capitulated to their demands and lost the war totally.
Be a **** IDIOT if you want, but taking the lead often means taking it to your enemy first, MORON!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
14 Aug 2026 9:22 am
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
14 Aug 2026 9:23 am
Beekeeper » Today, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑ Want a REASON WHY we often need to be the first to attack??
Dec.7th, 1941. Pearl Harbor, HI.
WE as a nation were in an ISOLATIONIST POSTURE and lost bigly for nearly a year. WE only had ~600,000 men in uniform at that time. Had the BATTLE OF MIDWAY been a success by the Japanese, there is a good chance we would have capitulated to their demands and lost the war totally.
Be a **** IDIOT if you want, but taking the lead often means taking it to your enemy first, MORON!!
Well, I don't know. Maybe if we would stop **** with other countries by putting them into poverty, so we can exploit their resources, they may not need a reason to attack us.
Just a thought.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
14 Aug 2026 11:51 am
Vegas » Today, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ Well, I don't know. Maybe if we would stop **** with other countries by putting them into poverty, so we can exploit their resources, they may not need a reason to attack us.
Just a thought.
Got a LINK to back up your **** DIATRIBE??
I didn't think so. But IF you can NAME ONE COUNTRY where we did that, we can kick your *** inside of 10 minutes with the FACTS!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
14 Aug 2026 12:52 pm
That brain dead mother **** didn't have a clue about anything. Sleeping on a beach while others used the autopen.
14 Aug 2026 1:06 pm
Did I miss something, was Iran able to launch a nuke?
14 Aug 2026 3:56 pm
Are you implying that we never bombed the **** out of any country for their oil and minerals?Beekeeper » Today, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ Got a LINK to back up your **** DIATRIBE??
I didn't think so. But IF you can NAME ONE COUNTRY where we did that, we can kick your *** inside of 10 minutes with the FACTS!!
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
14 Aug 2026 6:33 pm
hitchens-razor.png (375×360)Vegas » Today, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you implying that we never bombed the **** out of any country for their oil and minerals?
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
14 Aug 2026 11:06 pm
Whoever convinced you of that has a real mean streak.DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 11:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, ****... that makes us weak as hell. No wait a tick...
I recall that old saw: "Our tax dollars at work."
We own the military, right? The military does our bidding.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 4650 users online :: 10 registered, 16 bots, and 4624 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Squatchman, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, Deezer Shoove, Huey
Bots: Bolt, facebookexternalhit, okhttp, LCC, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, GPTBot, CriteoBot, proximic, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, YandexBot, bingbot, Applebot, curl/7, Baiduspider